An independent probe conducted by a third-party panel appointed in 2023 by the top Japanese talent agency, Johnny & Associates, concluded that the agency’s late founder, Johnny Kitagawa, had, for decades, sexually assaulted teenage boys aspiring to succeed in the entertainment industry. The expert panel, commissioned to recommend ways to prevent recurrence of such abuse and exploitation, also faulted the mass-media for ignoring the allegations against Kitagawa that had been reported extensively by the weekly magazine
Shukan Bunshun from 1999 to 2000, pointing out that the “silence of the mass media” contributed to the continuation of abuse that resulted in a large number of victims. To learn how the public viewed these issues, we conducted an online survey from late February to early March in 2024.
Regarding the issue of sexual assault by Kitagawa, more than 80% of the respondents said they considered this as a "serious issue." Regarding its coverage by the media, just over 60% said they "approved" the reporting by
Shukan Bunshun before the issue became widely acknowledged, and over 70% said other media outlets "should have reported on it" as well.
The percentage of people who "watched," "watched part of," or "thought they had watched" the investigative programs on the issue broadcast by the major Japanese television networks was in the upper 50s combined. As to how they viewed these programs, the most common positive opinion they agreed with was that the programs "conveyed the voices of the victims."
When asked whether the broadcasters had responded to the criticism of "silence of the mass media" by airing such investigative programs, over 50% answered “no.” The most common reason selected for the negative view was that "the investigations into the background of the 'silence’ of the television stations' were insufficient."
Regarding the media’s news coverage of sexual violence in general, over 30% of the respondents agreed that the reporting was adequate, while over 50% disagreed. Among the options for perceived problems in such coverage, over 40% chose "reporting is often too short-term."
In terms of what people expect from the media, the most favored choice was "reporting in a way that minimizes secondary victimization, such as attacks on victims on social media," followed by "spreading knowledge about the issue of sexual violence." Over 30% of the respondents selected the above and the following answers: "communicating the seriousness of the impact of secondary victimization when reporting on the issue of sexual violence," and "uncovering the facts through investigative reporting when victims come out to make allegations."
View full abstract