Introduction: Surgical treatment was indicated for patients with pyogenic spondylitis with failed conservative treatment or significant progressive spinal deformity with biomechanical instability. Traditionally, anterior decompression and debridement, followed by an anterior spinal fusion (ASF), is the surgical treatment for pyogenic spondylitis. Some studies have shown that patients may be good candidates for percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) and rod fixation. Since 2014, posterior fusion using PPS has been performed in addition to ASF. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the postoperative results of only ASF (ASF alone group) with PPS in addition to ASF (PPS combination group) in our hospital.
Methods: We included 8 patients in the ASF alone group who underwent surgery in our hospital between 2003 and 2013 and 11 patients in the PPS combination group after 2014. The causative bacteria, Kulowski's classification, presence or absence of postoperative paralysis, number of postoperative days until C-reactive protein (CRP) -negative conversion, number of days until postoperative bed rest, and presence or absence of bone fusion were investigated.
Results: In the ASF alone group, 2 patients with MSSA, 2 with MRSA, 2 with CNS and 3 with culture negative were observed as the causative bacteria. In the PPS combination group, 3 patients with MSSA, 2 with CNS, 1 with Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1 with GBS, 1 with Edwardsiella tarda, and 3 with culture negative were observed. The culture-positive rates were 62.5% and 72.2% in the ASF alone and 72.2% PPS combination groups, respectively. According to Kulowski's classification, 3 patients were classified as subacute and 5 as chronic in the ASF alone group, and 4 as subacute and 7 as chronic in the PPS combination group (p = 0.703). No postoperative paralytic symptoms were observed. The mean day until CRP-negative conversion was 40.9 and 34.9 days in the ASF alone and 34.9 PPS combination groups, respectively (p = 0.316). The mean day until postoperative bed rest was 52.8 days and 3.7 days in the ASF alone and PPS combination groups, respectively (p = 0.006). Non-union occurred in 37.5% and 9.1% patients in the ASF alone and PPS combination groups, respectively (p = 0.177).
Conclusions: Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior instrumentation provided an alternative method for the treatment of pyogenic spondylitis, resulting in lesser bed rest time compared to the traditional only ASF approach. In our series, the percutaneous technique achieved satisfactory results in a long-term follow-up and showed no adverse effects on infection control.
View full abstract