1. It is accepted as dogma that all action comes from the central nervous system. Symptomology can be predicted from lesions, known as “focal lesions”.
2. However, even with highly localized speech apraxia, 1) There is still debate concerning legions surrounding the definition and findings of symptomology, 2) There is graceful degradation centered on the lesions. 3) It is doubtful that pathegenesis can be explained only by researching lesions and activation.
3. It is understood that symptom definition compares to a corresponding lesion, and that there is functional localization with legions. However, as an example of a function whose distributed or structure is not understood, in speech function 1) involves many complex processes, 2) shows graceful degradation, and 3) is a group of transitional processes.
4. Taking apraxia as an example of a distributed but unified network, there is left hemispheric dominance, but the extent of “central system” white matter pathology is unclear, indicating it result from a “localized” network.
5. As a highly localized example not well understood, intelligence encompasses a possible aggregate of a wide network of position and functions.
6. Even in highly localized legions, reduction in function from injury can manifest in graceful degradation. It is insufficient to elucidate psychoneurological function by solely pursuing researching on the localized character of legions and activations. Future contributions can be made from other research fields.
View full abstract