Aim : The aim of this study is to investigate the detail of complications caused by manipulation of endoscope on ERCP and find ways to cope with complications.
Methods : A total of 1907 patients performed ERCP were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 69.5 years, and the patients were 1175 men and 732 women. Anatomical characteristic of the patient’s stomach were consisted of normal stomach (n=1791) , reconstruction by Billroth I (n=49) , reconstruction by Billroth II (n=47) , reconstruction by Roux-en-Y (n=9) , and others (n=7) . The incidence or details of complications, characteristics of the operators, ways to cope with complications, and outcome were evaluated.
Results : The total incidence of complications was 1.3% (24/1907) , of which laceration in 20 cases and perforation in 4 cases was observed. The incidence of complications in normal stomach was 1.3% (23/1791) with laceration in 20cases and perforation in 3 cases, and in reconstruction by Billroth II was 2.1% (1/47) with perforation in 1 case. The locations of laceration were esophagogastric junction in 19 cases and antrum in 1 case, whereas location of perforation were descending portion of duodenum in 2 cases, superior duodenal angulus in 1 case, and afferent loop in 1 case. The lacerations, duodenal perforations, and afferent loop perforation were caused by push manipulation of scope, stretch manipulation of scope, and contact of a transparent cap attached to the tip of anterior-viewing endoscope, respectively. The median number of the procedure of operators who developed a complication was 32.5, and 75% of operators were considered to be non-expert, who had ERCP experiences of less than 50 times. Laceration was treated with thrombin spraying in 11 cases, clipping in 6 cases, injection of hypersaline with epinephrine in 1 case, whereas no treatment was required in 5 cases. As for perforation, 2 cases were cured by only conservative medical management, although 2 cases immediately required the operation. There was no fatal case associated with manipulation of the endoscope during ERCP.
Conclusions : Extreme care should be taken to insert the scope into the stomach to prevent laceration, and to stretch the manipulation of scope to prevent duodenal perforation, especially the operator is considered to be non-expert. It is important to collaborate closely with surgery in case of development complications caused by ERCP taking surgical treatment into consideration, especially in case of perforation.
View full abstract