The release of radioactive materials to the environment causes anxiety among the general population. To prevent mental harm due to this anxiety, understanding the influence of radiation is important.
To clearly explain the influence of radioactive materials released to the environment to a lay person, a literature search was performed. Attention was particularly given to radioactive iodine, whose insufficiently high doses can cause thyroid cancer.
First, outlines of typical incidents and accidents, including nuclear tests, medical accident, accidents in nuclear power plants, and an atomic fuel reprocessing institution, with the release of radioactive iodine were completed.
Next, the general numerical value of the release amount and the dosage of the radioactive iodine were calculated using the methods documented in the UNSCEAR reports. These methods, which are the trial calculation of the average annual doses, are suitable for determining and comparing dose levels as well as assessing the risk to the general public. Thus, the calculated result described here should be used in other applications only with caution, and site-specific data should be used where appropriate.
The biggest release source of 131I to the environment was atmospheric nuclear tests performed from 1945 to 1980, and the practical effective dose of 131I that the public received due to these tests was an average of 1.85 μSv/year. In contrast, the release amount of radioactive iodine from the Fukushima nuclear accident was 1/1000 that of atmospheric nuclear tests and approximately 1/10 - 1/3 that of the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident. The influence of the released amount of radioactive iodine from the Fukushima nuclear accident on thyroid was likely sufficiently low.
The dose of 131I released from a reprocessing institution that the public received over a period of one year was calculated to be approximately 1/100,000 that of nuclear tests.
The dose level of radioactive iodine calculated from actual release amounts from the Rokkasho reprocessing plant, which is expected to continue operation in Japan, could be lower than the set dose limit. Considering safety precautions undertaken in the design of a factory, it is inferred that the actual dose is lower than the dose limit, which is estimated from a worst-case scenario.
View full abstract