Migrants found in migration solutions obtained from commercially available polyethylene products that may contain food were studied and analysed via liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF) for non-target screening and LC-MS/MS for quantifying 14 substances in migration solutions. Furthermore, an analytical approach based on the retention gap was developed for accurate separation techniques using LC-MS/MS. Irganox 1076 was detected at a maximum of 1.5 mg/kg, which was 1/4 of the Specific Migration Limit in the EU, in nine commercially available plastic bags tested. This is in accordance with European Regulation No 10/2011/EU. Furthermore, migration of Erucamide and Irgafos 168-oxide was confirmed.

A simple method of identification using a color reaction was developed for Omphalotus guepiniformis. Only Omphalotus guepiniformis turned turquoise green. Other edible mushrooms resembling the mushroom did not change color when the beam reagent (5 w/v% potassium hydroxide ethanolic solution) was dripped onto the mushroom pileus. Furthermore, ethanol extract and mock cooking products of this mushroom exhibited the same color reaction. These results demonstrate this method as useful for identifying Omphalotus guepiniformis during mushroom hunting or during investigations of food poisoning.

A validation study was performed on the modified analytical method for the migration solution of heptane, 20% ethanol and 4% acetic acid for the determination of bisphenol A migrating from polycarbonate food apparatuses, containers, and packaging. The analytes for the method were bisphenol A, phenol and p-tert-butylphenol. The repeatability, within-laboratory reproducibility and trueness of the method was estimated in the range of 0.2–1.8%, 0.4–2.6% and 95–102% respectively. These results showed that the method is useful as an analytical method for the migration solution of heptane, 20% ethanol and 4% acetic acid. Furthermore, the applicability of the determination methods with a fluorescence detector was verified. As a result of the validation study, the repeatability, within-laboratory reproducibility and trueness of the method was estimated in the range of 0.1–2.9%, 0.2–3.1% and 94–101% respectively. It was confirmed that the measurement with a fluorescence detector is also available.